Posts

HGTV’s Not-So-Smart Home

I guess the term smart home does not necessarily mean green home. After arranging a visit of HGTV’s overpriced $20 tour we left feeling disappointed. The home valued at nearly $1 million was neither green nor smart. Painted with a couple good pastels, the home had a great beach feel to it, but it seemed to lack much of any feature I’d attribute to a smart home. ADT had cleverly placed cameras around the house to showcase their monitoring solutions, so technically it was a secure home. Overpriced toilets in each of the bathrooms offer new buttons to press rather than the traditional flushing lever.  Pseudo-high-tech fans circulate in the bed and living rooms. Keypad doorlocks control all the doors.  Garage door openers have built in batteries for when the power goes out. Shades on the back windows open and close by an ipad app, though you’re going to have to switch out the battery every couple months. A $5,000 induction based stove insures you can only use specially made cookware. Unlike regular infrared or convection based stoves, an induction based stove essentially works with magnet wire to transfer energy to pots and pans which is then converted locally to heat, which I guess is cool because your stove never actually heats up, and that’s nice if you want a stove that can double as a seat or as a desk, but this is a stove, it’s meant to get hot.

By far the most intelligent features of the ‘smart’ home were the rain barrel they had in front, and the metal roof on top. I say that because the metal roof, unlike normal asphalt and tile roofs reflects a lot of sunlight keeping the house cooler, it can also be more durable in the event of a storm or hurricane.

Beyond these honorable mentions we saw in the house, there were the things we didn’t see that bothered us the most. There were no solar panels, there was no programmable thermostat (they just had a vanilla set-it-and-forget-it thermostat) there were no LED lights, or CFL’s they for whatever reason seemed to prefer using incandescent lights and more energy. Which isn’t very smart. I wasn’t really expecting to see incandescent lights in a ‘smart’ home I thought surely at a bare minimum they would have CFL’s, I didn’t even know they still sold incandescent lights in stores with which to replace your old burnt out ones. But somehow they still managed to special order some incandescent light bulbs to keep their meter spinning. It’s 2013, is this really the smart home of the future? Aren’t we supposed to be in space already with hover cars, parking in carports in our jetson’s-esque dome homes? Instead the house that’s being touted nationally on the home and garden channel as a ‘smart’ home is still using much of what was made for homes more than 100 years ago, while also being as energy efficient as an SUV. In a dire time when greenhouse gas emissions have surpassed the threshold warned about by global scientists, we need to ask ourselves, is this really the best we can do?
2013-05-12 14.12.32
When I think of a smart home

Again in retrospect we were referred to check out the smart home by JEA, who informed us it was a good example of solar energy in homes. There were no solar panels, and there were no solar water heaters.